Kriativ-tech Volume 1, Issue 7, April 2018, Pages: xxx Received: Dec. 28, 2019; Accepted: Feb. 25, 2020. Published: Jul. 30, 2020.
Authors
António Santos, Assistant Professor at ISTEC
Media
To cite this article
António Santos, Mathematical course Design for eLearning environmentDOI: 10.31112/kriativ-tech-2020-06-38
Abstract
Mathematics, although seen as the ‘Achilles' heel of many students, has always accompanied humanity, adapting to the evolution of the times, and as such in an era when information technologies are part of people's daily lives. On the other hand, and taking into account the need for convenience of students, as well as the possibility of reaching a larger number of students, many educational institutions are beginning to adopt eLearning as one of the training possibilities. Since eLearning allows students to have access to their training anywhere and at any time, thus adapting to their pace of study and the time available for that purpose. Teachers and designers of mathematics courses try to take advantage of this form of teaching so that students reach their intended goals and start to see mathematics in a different way.The involvement of students with the course can be an asset and motivate teachers and designers of mathematics courses, to create models that involve students in the teaching-learning process, and thereby increase student satisfaction with the course, as well as their greatest acquisition of knowledge. To carry out this task, there are some methodologies to be taken into account, recommended by some researchers.
Keywords
eLearning, Mathematics, Course Design, Social Presence, Assessment.
References
Aiken, R. L. (1976). Update on Attitudes and Other affective Variables in Learning Mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 46(2), 293 – 311.Aldiab, A., Chowdhury, H., Alex Kootsookos, A. and Alam, F.(2017) Prospect of eLearning in higher education sectors of Saudi Arabia: A review, Energy Procedia 110 .574 – 580.Assessing by Group Work. (2018, December 14). the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. Retrieved from https://teaching.unsw.edu.au/assessing-group-work.Bell, Steven. (2020). Discovering Open Educational Resources. University Libraries. Acesso em 12 de Agosto de 2020, em https://guides.temple.edu/OER.Berge, Z.L. and Collins, M. (1995). (Eds.) Computer-mediated communication and the online classroom, Distance learning. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Vol. 3.Berge, Z.L. (1997). Computer Conferencing and the On-Line Classroom, International Jl. of Educational Telecommunications ,Vol 3(1), 3-21.Berge, Z.L. (2002) Active, Interactive and Ref.letive Elearning. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education. Volume 3(2). 181-190.Bubnys, Remigijus. (2014). Reflective Learning as a Prerequisite for Implementation Effective and Student-Centered Studies. New Approaches to Improving Health Care Education: Today and Tomorrow. 17-27.Colomer, J., Pallisera, M., Fullana, J., Perez-Burriel, M. and Fernández, R.. (2013). Reflective Learning in Higher Education: A Comparative Analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 93. 364-370.Connolly, Thomas and Stansfield, Mark (2007), Developing Constructivist Learning Environments to Enhance e-Learning, Principles of Effective Online Teachin. Buzzetto-More, N. A. (Ed.). Informing Science Press. Santa Rosa, California, 19-36.Connolly, Thomas and Stansfield, Mark. (2006). Using Games-Based eLearning Technologies in Overcoming Difficulties in Teaching Information Systems. Journal of Information Technology Education. Volume 5. 459-476.Crosslin, M., Benham, B., Dellinger, J., Patterson, A., Semingson, P.,Spann, C., Usman, B. and Watkins, H. (2018). Creating Online Learning Experiences, A Brief Guide to Online Courses, from Small and Private to Massive and Open, Mavs Open Press, Arlington.Goodyear, Peter. (2015). Teaching as design. HERDSA Review of Higher Education. Vol. 2, 27-50.Inglis, John. (2007). Video Conferencing In The Classroom: A Glimpse At The Use Of This Technology In Education. Principles of Effective Online Teaching, Buzzetto-More, N. A. (Ed.). Informing Science Press. Santa Rosa, California. 155-177.Liu, Youmei. (2007). Building and Sustaining Learning Communities. Principles of Effective Online Teaching. Buzzetto-More, N. A. (Ed.). Informing Science Press. Santa Rosa, California. 137-153.Popovici, Anca and Mironov, Cosmina (2015). Students’ perception on using eLearning technologies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 180 ,1514 – 1519.Psotka J. (2012) Interactive Learning Environments. In: Seel N.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_321.Ramsey, Caroline. (2006). Introducing Reflective Learning. The Open University Business SchoolSiemens, George and Tittenberger, Peter.(2009). Handbook of Emerging Technologies for earning. University of Manitoba.Smith, G. G. and Ferguson, David.(2005) Student attrition in mathematics e-learning, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 21(3), 323-334.Student Peer Assessment. (2019, February 28). the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. Retrieved from https://teaching.unsw.edu.au/peer-assessment.Sweat-Guy, Retta. (2007) The Role of Interaction in e-Learning. Principles of Effective Online Teaching, Buzzetto-More, N. A. (Ed.). Informing Science Press. Santa Rosa, California, 85-105.Yushau, Balarabe. (2006) .The Effects of Blended E-Learning on Mathematics and Computer Attitudes in Pre-Calculus Algebra. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast.Vol. 3(2), 176-183.